The Right To Joke
|
Page 5 of 19 Jokes under Socialism: first prize five years in Siberia. Yet it was the broadcasters and the media elite generally who provided the ideal social circumstances for the proliferation of the jokes. Perhaps the point is best illustrated by reference to the political jokes that flourished so strongly in Eastern Europe under socialism or indeed before that in National Socialist Germany:
None of these jokes could be told in public, let alone published or broadcast under socialism. They were the jokes of the people and not the People's Jokes. They were ubiquitous. Everybody told them despite the risk of reprisals. A Bulgarian colleague used to tell them to me openly in English at lunchtime in Gabrovo in Bulgaria in the 1980s but always referred to Brezhnev as "Mr. B" in case an informer at the next table might work out what we were laughing at. Yet they were not in any real sense acts of political resistance from an often crushed and fatalistic population. Also even the members of the elite who enjoyed enormous privileges under socialism knew and laughed at the jokes. An Armenian who introduced himself at a meeting of media bosses as the Director of Radio Armenia was greeted with prolonged laughter. All the caviar guzzling commissar cats present knew the popular joke convention that Radio Armenia (also known as Radio Erivan) was a source of question and answer jokes about the stupidity of the party regime.
Likewise the jokes had no effect. If after the fall of communism one were to ask a panel of experts or people in general to list the ten main reasons why the system collapsed, jokes would not even make the list. The jokes were an index of widespread alienation but were not a potent form of dissent. Did they keep up morale during the long night of socialism or were they a safety valve that helped the system survive? Who cares? Either way their effect was trivial. People told them because they enjoyed them. They played with the forbidden. They were an escape from and time off from the compulsory political discourse of socialism. They were not a means of expressing sentiments that could not be directly stated for those who were discontented expressed these views directly anyway to the same trusted intimate associates to whom they whispered the jokes. Besides most people were apathetic and dejected and saw no possibility of anything changing; the jokes were not resistance they were fun, though like many forms of fun they were accompanied by a degree of risk. |
|




